Mario Martinez-Jimenez

I will be on the academic job market this year (2026-27). 

I am an Imperial Research Fellow in the Department of Economics & Public Policy at Imperial Business School. I was a Visiting Postdoctoral Scholar at Stanford University in the Department of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine for the 2025–2026 academic year.

Research fields: health, labor, and child development.

I am a health and labor economist. I study how health and labor-market shocks shape family decisions and economic well-being over the life course. My work focuses on early-life health, mental health, and fertility, with a broader interest in how disadvantage is transmitted across generations.

Referees:

Job Market Paper

When Careers Stall: Early-Career Job Insecurity and Fertility over the Life Cycle

with Judit Vall Castello

Abstract

Can greater exposure to job insecurity at labor-market entry have lasting effects on fertility? We study Spain’s 1984 reform, which sharply expanded fixed-term hiring for new entrants while preserving protection for permanent workers. Using differences in reform exposure across nearby birth cohorts of low- and high-skilled women, we find that the reform increased years of non-permanent employment and lowered contribution-based income among low-skilled women, without a detectable change in days worked. Exposed low-skilled cohorts experienced a 15.2% decline in births per woman at the cohort level and delayed first motherhood by about five months. Mechanism evidence suggests that employment insecurity constrains the realization of fertility plans, with exposed low-skilled women more likely to have fewer children than they desire. We build and estimate a life-cycle model linking early-career employment risk to fertility decisions over the reproductive horizon. The model attributes the fertility decline primarily to adverse entry conditions and accumulated employment insecurity, rather than lower early-career resources or the mechanical consequences of later childbearing, and shows that reducing insecurity can recover some forgone fertility. Together, the evidence shows that reforms increasing early-career job insecurity can delay motherhood and reduce realized fertility.

🏆 Award

Winner of the International Health Economics Association (iHEA) Early Career Researcher Best Paper Award.

🎤 Presentations

NBER Conference on Fertility and Declining Population Growth in High-Income Countries, Stanford University, ASHEcon, EALE, and IHEA.

Working Papers

Retirement During Economic Crises and Mental Health

with Bruce Hollingsworth and Eugenio Zucchelli (R&R at the Journal of Demographic Economics)

Abstract

Economic crises are common, but their timing is uncertain. This paper examines whether the mental health and well-being effects of retirement change in the presence of major economic shocks. Using a range of causal empirical methodologies, with a particular focus on a fixed-effects instrumental variables approach, we analyse longitudinal data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) covering a representative sample of over 50-year-old individuals in England. We exploit regional variations in unemployment rates following the economic crisis in the short term (2004-2013) and the longer term (2004-2019). The findings show that moving into retirement while living in a region and year particularly hit by the crisis significantly decreases the probability of reporting a new depression or anxiety diagnosis by 4.9 percentage points, mostly driven by white-collar and men retirees. We show that financial security, healthy lifestyles, and the ability to early retirement help maintain the mental health benefits of retirement during economic crises. These findings suggest that policies enhancing financial security and resilience and promoting healthy lifestyle initiatives could bolster retirees' resilience and support healthy ageing.

🎤 Presentations

EALE, HESG, LoLaHESG, PHE Public Health Research and Science Conference, and Health Economics at Lancaster seminars.

Early-Life Conditions and Children's Adaptive Behavior Scales at Age Three

with Edith Aguirre (Accepted at the European Journal of Health Economics)

Abstract

This paper examines how early-life conditions are associated with children's adaptive behavior at age three in the United Kingdom. We study two indicators of adverse perinatal health, low birth weight and preterm birth, alongside breastfeeding as an early postnatal investment. Using data on 4,335 children from the Understanding Society Pregnancy and Early Childhood dataset observed between 2011 and 2023, the primary analysis combines weighted ordinary least squares with inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment; correlated random effects and within-sibling comparisons are used as complementary sensitivity analyses. Low birth weight and preterm birth are associated with lower adaptive behavior, with the largest gradients in the physical domain. Breastfeeding is more strongly associated with communication and socio-emotional functioning. In the preferred specification, the estimated associations are about 0.3 standard deviations for low birth weight, 0.2 to 0.25 standard deviations for preterm birth, and 0.1 to 0.15 standard deviations for breastfeeding. A supplementary pathway analysis using maternal engagement measured in a survey wave preceding the age-three outcome provides suggestive evidence of a positive engagement component, especially for socio-emotional development; it is reported as a model-based rather than causal decomposition. These findings show how risks visible around birth map into functional differences relevant for screening, referral, and targeted family support in the preschool years.

🎤 Presentations

ASHEcon, IHEA, II Rome Health Economic Workshop, and the School of Public Health at Imperial College London.

Work in Progress

Who Gets the Shot? Determinants of Childhood Vaccination among Medicaid Beneficiaries.

with Petra Persson (Stanford University), Maya Rossin-Slater (Stanford University) & Grace Sventek (Stanford University).

Abstract

Abstract forthcoming.

When Care Is Far from Home: Access to Neonatal Care and Maternal Mental Health.

with Genna Campain (Stanford University), Helen Kissel (Simon Fraser University) & Maya Rossin-Slater (Stanford University).

Abstract

Abstract forthcoming.

After the Gunfire: Local School-Shooting Exposure and Children’s Primary Care Utilization.

with Chris Lowenstein (University of Missouri) & David Rehkopf (Stanford University).

Abstract

How does exposure to local gun violence affect utilization of pediatric primary care? We draw on individual-level electronic health record data from a nationwide primary care database, linked with 80 school shootings between 2022–2023, to study how traumatic community-level events affect the utilization of care for common mental health and neurodevelopmental disorders in the primary care setting. Our difference-in-differences study design compares changes in care received among children living 0–5 miles from the affected school with changes among children living 10–15 miles away, before and after the shooting occurs. We find that primary care contacts for mental health or neurodevelopmental care increases by 1.33 percentage points, or 20.1% of the pre-shooting comparison mean (wild-bootstrap p-value 0.044). The increase is concentrated in neurodevelopmental care, primarily in visits with evidence of ADHD medication and with ADHD-related clinical notes. We find no evidence of increased visits related to anxiety, depression, or stressor-related conditions, although many outcomes are imprecisely estimated. The findings point to changes in recorded care near affected schools in the wake of school shootings.

🎤 Presentations

2026 APPAM Fall Conference.

Do Climate Mobilisations Weaken Young Adults’ Economic Attachment? Evidence from Fridays for Future.

with Laure de Preux (Imperial Business School).

Abstract

Do nearby climate mobilisations weaken young adults' attachment to work and education? We link European Social Survey interviews to the timing and location of five Fridays for Future mobilisations from 2019 to 2023. Our triple-difference design compares four-week near-versus-far changes for adults aged 18–40 with the same changes for adults aged 41–50. The events sharply increased movement-specific search attention. Yet nearby mobilisation did not reduce an index of education, employment, job search, and financial security: the estimate is 0.26 standard deviations (95 percent confidence interval [−0.09, 0.62]). Outcome-specific bounds exclude a 20 percent deterioration in education, active unemployment, and income difficulty, but not in paid work or NEET status. The well-being estimate is negative but imprecise (−0.23 standard deviations; [−0.55, 0.09]) and varies across younger age bins, so it does not support a common youth welfare effect. These estimates capture an age-differential response to regional proximity, not the effect of attending a protest or personally noticing it. The evidence rejects broad short-run economic withdrawal while leaving temporary affective costs unresolved.

Beyond Birthweight: Neonatal Care and Educational Outcomes

with Orla Doyle (University College Dublin).

Abstract

Birthweight and gestational age are widely used to measure children's initial health endowment, yet they may overlook other important dimensions of neonatal health that are relevant to subsequent human-capital development. This study examines whether neonatal-unit attendance captures additional information about early health and whether combining these indicators reveals differences in educational outcomes from childhood to early adulthood. Using the nationally representative Growing Up in Ireland Child Cohort, we distinguish four neonatal-health profiles based on low birthweight, prematurity, and neonatal-unit attendance. We find that 7.7 percent of children were born at term and of normal birthweight but nevertheless attended neonatal care, a group that conventional birth-risk indicators would classify as low risk. Educational outcomes differ across these profiles in ways that are not fully captured by birthweight and prematurity alone. Children with conventional birth-risk indicators exhibit disadvantages in reading, learning difficulties, and cognitive skills, while term, normal-birthweight neonatal attendees have significantly lower cognitive scores in late adolescence than children with neither neonatal-health marker. These findings highlight the limitations of relying exclusively on birthweight and gestational age to characterize early health and suggest that neonatal healthcare use can provide complementary information for understanding inequalities in subsequent human-capital development.

Schooling and Gender Norms.

Solo-authored.

Abstract

Does schooling make people judge women's and men's employment more equally? This paper combines seven rounds of the European Social Survey with country- and cohort-specific compulsory-schooling reforms and a randomized split-ballot vignette. One additional year of schooling raises rejection of men's priority for scarce jobs by 1.6 percentage points and a two-item employment-equality index by 1.2 points. The job-priority estimate remains significant under country-level wild-bootstrap inference, and every round-specific employment coefficient is positive. Independently, assigning an otherwise identical full-time-work scenario to a mother rather than a father lowers approval by 18.5 percentage points, with penalties of 22.9 points in 2006 and 14.4 points in 2018. The instrumental-variables estimate of schooling's moderation of this penalty is 0.9 percentage points per year (standard error 0.7), so the data do not establish that schooling closes the gap. Schooling promotes more equal stated employment attitudes, while a large maternal-employment penalty remains and is not shown to narrow with education.

Publications

† first/lead author    ‡ senior author

Economics

Health Policy / Health Services Research